Tue 7 July 2026
Daily Brief — Curated and contextualised by Best Practice AI
Regulators Propose Oversight, Firms Expand Headcount, and Markets Question Returns
TL;DRNew academic research proposes a macro-prudential framework for frontier AI, mirroring post-2008 banking regulations. Meanwhile, firm-level data from 21,000 U.S. companies shows that AI investment is currently driving workforce expansion rather than automation-led layoffs. Markets remain skeptical, with economists warning of a painful repricing as promised productivity gains fail to materialize. Simultaneously, Chinese firms are increasingly pivoting to domestic silicon to bypass US-led export restrictions.
The stories that matter most
Selected and contextualised by the Best Practice AI team
Macro-Prudential AI Governance: A Two-Layer Early Warning and Response System for Frontier AI
arXiv:2607.03542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier-AI governance today faces a problem structurally analogous to the one banking regulation faced pre-2008, and which post-2008 reforms (Basel III, Dodd-Frank) have since addressed. Two gaps recur: discovering a risk is not tantamount to acting on it, and individual-model review is unlike managing correlated build-up across the sector. Drawing on the Basel III framework and the U.S. financial-stability architecture, I propose a macro-prudential early warning and response system ("MEWRS") for internal frontier AI. These are systems deployed for labs' own internal research, testing, and production workflows, as distinct from externally released products. Layer A adapts the finder-coordinator-defender early-warning model to route structured reports on dual-use capabilities, autonomy indicators, and security compromises through a government clearinghouse to domain-specific defender working groups. Layer B calibrates operational controls via three quantitative buffer metrics, namely Effective Compute-at-Risk (ECAR), Cumulative Red-Team Hours (CRTH), and an Alignment Robustness Score (ARS), so that faster capability scaling automatically triggers stronger safeguards, analogously to how risk-weighted assets drive capital ratios under Basel III. I outline the reporting schema, map six Basel III mechanisms onto AI-governance analogues, identify seven failure modes with concrete mitigations, and sketch an exercise-based validation plan. MEWRS is designed to detect correlated risk build-ups across the frontier-AI sector and create pre-committed off-ramps before a cascade unfolds.
Strategic Information Disclosure in Algorithmic Pricing
arXiv:2607.04345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As firms increasingly adopt AI-powered pricing algorithms, a key and urgent policy concern is how to regulate the potential algorithmic collusion. This paper approaches the regulatory question through the lens of information design and examines how different disclosure rules, committed to by a third-party intermediary, shape learning outcomes when firms delegate pricing to Q-learning algorithms under stochastic demand. We analyze three disclosure rules: no disclosure, full disclosure, and upper censorship. Upper censorship, which truthfully reveals low-demand states while pooling high-demand ones, delivers higher profits than full disclosure, consistent with theoretical predictions. However, we uncover a profit reversal: when the discount factor is high, no disclosure yields higher profits than full disclosure, whereas when the discount factor is low, full disclosure performs better. This pattern is exactly the opposite of what classical collusion theory predicts. Overall, these findings show that Q-learning agents respond systematically to the information structure and further suggest that restricting information sharing may backfire when algorithms are sufficiently patient, highlighting the need to reassess regulatory approaches in AI-mediated markets.
Robots and the Public Finance of Disability Insurance
arXiv:2607.02892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automation affects public budgets through wages and the tax base, and also through inflows into social insurance. We estimate the effect of industrial robot exposure on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) applications using confidential commuting-zone data and a shift-share design that instruments U.S. exposure with earlier European robot diffusion. One additional robot per 1,000 workers lowers applications by about 8 per 100,000 working-age residents, with the largest declines among workers aged 55 to 64. Employment-to-population ratios do not fall in exposed commuting zones, which weighs against broad local displacement as the sole explanation. A year's flow of averted applications corresponds to about \$3.4 billion in expected SSDI and Medicare obligations, or about \$17,000 per robot-year, in present value rather than realized cash. Displacement adds to social-insurance costs, whereas robot exposure here reduces them, an offset that assessments built only on displacement leave unpriced.
Torsten Slok: AI hasn’t delivered on productivity hype, and it means 'painful repricing' of markets | Fortune
Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok warns there’s reason to be concerned about AI being unable to yet generate returns on investment.
The Hidden Water Geography of U.S. Hyperscale Data Centers in the AI Era
arXiv:2607.02531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Water use by data centers is routinely reported as a single footprint, but water is consumed through two physically distinct pathways: at the site for cooling and in the power system that generates electricity. We mapped both pathways for 472 U.S. hyperscale facilities by linking facility locations to electricity regions, hydrologic basins, and water-stress data. Under baseline assumptions, operational water consumption totals approximately 300 GL yr^-1 (range 205-451 across scenarios), with electricity-related water contributing three-quarters of the total. The two pathways produce different hotspot geographies: direct cooling burdens concentrate in stressed western and south-central basins, whereas electricity-related burdens concentrate in a few eastern grid regions with fossil-heavy supply. Just 3 of 24 hosting balancing authorities account for 59% of electricity-related water. Separating pathways identifies which decisions matter where: cooling design and water sourcing locally, electricity planning and procurement regionally
A New Look at AI’s Impact on Jobs: Firm-Level AI Spending and Workforce Adjustment
Research across 21,000 U.S. companies suggests that significant Generative AI investment is currently linked to workforce expansion rather than immediate automation-driven job replacement.
Chinese Firms Leave Nvidia for Local AI Suppliers, Survey Shows
Chinese companies are ditching Nvidia Corp.’s advanced accelerators in favor of domestic silicon, underscoring how tensions with the US are reshaping the AI infrastructure buildout and propelling Beijing’s ambitions to substitute American technology.
The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments — The Information
The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments — The Information Partner Content # The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments By The Information Partnerships [email protected] Profile and archive At this year’s Milken Institute Global Conference, the discussions around enterprise AI had shifted. The question among executives was no longer if AI would pay off, but how. Many talked less about proving ROI and more about positioning their companies to capture it. That tension—between AI’s capabilities and organizations’ capacity to keep up—was evident everywhere, from panel discussions to a private dinner co-hosted by Aily Labs founder and CEO Bianca Anghelina and The Information’s Cory Weinberg. ## The offshoring analogy that won’t quit Private equity firms announced a wave of joint ventures with frontier AI labs just as Milken opened—a
Economics & Markets
Masa Son’s greatest gamble
The SoftBank founder has bet the house on AI
US Treasury Report Warns AI Bubble Could Trigger Economic Shockwaves | PYMNTS.com
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has produced a draft report warning of extensive risks to the economy if the artificial intelligence market repeats
The AI Investment Supercycle of 2026: Unlocking Opportunities in a Polarized Market - Dr. Matthew Lynch
The world of finance is buzzing ... in 2026. Analysts are predicting that we are on the brink of an 'AI Investment Supercycle' like we've never seen before. As AI-driven companies continue to rise, their profound impact on global market capitalization is creating a significant divide between these tech innovators and traditional industries. This shift isn't just a trend; it represents ...
Record AI investment fuels strongest UK startup funding since 2022, finds HSBC report - National Technology
Record AI investment fuels strongest UK startup funding since 2022, finds HSBC report - National Technology #### Latest News ## Record AI investment fuels strongest UK startup funding since 2022, finds HSBC report 06/07/2026 UK startups attracted $17 billion in venture capital during the first half of 2026, more than double the amount raised last year, according to new research from HSBC Innovation Banking and data platform Dealroom. Funding reached its highest first-half level since 2022, rising 102 per cent from the $8.4 billion secured during the first six months of 2025, according to the report. AI dominated investment activity, with companies in the sector raising a record $12.6 billion in just six months. This total exceeded every previous full-year AI funding record and accounted for almost three quarters of all UK venture capital investment. The report said AI startups secure
Samsung shares tumble 10% despite record quarterly profit from AI boom
Investor concerns about massive investments outweigh April-to-June earnings fuelled by high memory chip prices
Honeywell spin-off targets AI supply chain with $14.5bn deal for Element
Deal will create a leading advanced materials company with a combined enterprise value of roughly $29bn
Solstice Advanced Materials to Buy Element Solutions for More Than $12 Billion
The Honeywell spinoff aims to expand its footprint in high-growth electronics and artificial intelligence infrastructure markets.
Anthropic Hits Near $350 Billion Valuation Following $10 Billion Funding Round - xix.ai
Anthropic Hits Near $350 Billion Valuation Following $10 Billion Funding Round - xix.ai News Anthropic Hits Near $350 Billion Valuation Following $10 Billion Funding Round Articles published by FredScott ## Revenue Growth Justifies the Numbers This soaring valuation is anchored by revenue growth that few technology firms have ever matched. According to its Series F announcement, Anthropic's annual run-rate revenue surged from around $1 billion at the start of 2025 to over $5 billion by August—a fivefold increase in just eight months. The company serves more than 300,000 business customers, with its count of large accounts (each generating over $100,000 in annual revenue) growing nearly sevenfold year-over-year. Claude Code reached $1 billion in annualized revenue within six months of its general availability in May 2025. This product, which allows developers to delegate coding task
Despite Trump's Demand for AI Investment, Treasury Report Warns Industry Poses 'Significant Risk' to US Economy | Common Dreams
US Treasury Department report warns of potential financial bubble in AI industry, posing risks to American economy. Concerns raised about overvaluation and profitability of AI firms.
Insert token to continue, says AI. Yeah, about that...
Commentary on the current state of the AI bubble and market concerns.
Arista Networks Thrives on AI Boom, Defying Valuation Concerns with Strong Growth and Cash Flow
Arista Networks projects 28% sales growth in 2026, driven by high demand for AI infrastructure in data centers.
Chip Stocks Rally in AI Trade Revival | The Close 7/6/2026
Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Morgan Stanley PWM Executive Director Katerina Simonetti, BlackRock Deputy CIO of Global Fixed Income Russ Brownback, Jefferies Equity Research Analyst David Chiaverini, Hamilton Lane Co-CEO Erik Hirsch, Wells Fargo Investment Institute Head of Global Investment Strategy Paul Christopher, Bokeh Capital Partners Founder & Chief Investment Officer Kim Forrest, US Chief Design Officer Joe Gebbia, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, & Churchill Asset Management Vice Chairman & Chief Investment Strategist Randy Schwimmer. (Source: Bloomberg)
Asia stocks fall as AI valuation fears overshadow Samsung’s blockbuster earnings By Investing.com
The weakness spread across the broader semiconductor supply chain. SK Hynix Inc (KS:000660) dropped over 8% after formally launching the marketing process for its planned U.S. listing on Monday, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 tumbled 1.6%. The broader TOPIX slipped 0.2%. Selling spread across Asia’s AI hardware ...
Intellectia
While this trend is unlikely to eliminate demand for general-purpose GPUs entirely, it could limit the total addressable market for Nvidia and AMD in the largest data center deployments. The AI boom is unfolding against a complex macroeconomic backdrop. Global GDP growth is projected at approximately 3% for 2026, with the U.S. expected to grow around 1.75%. These are moderate growth rates that suggest the AI investment ...
Agility Robotics Going Public via Churchill Capital XI SPAC at $2.5B
Agility Robotics is going public via a SPAC merger at a $2.5 billion valuation, marking the largest capital raise for a humanoid robotics company to date.
AI startup that’s never turned a profit say's it'll totally be around in 2047 to close its $19B lease
Model dev and AGI fearmonger Anthropic signs 20-year lease with TeraWulf
Broad Market Growth Expected in US Stocks Amid AI and Semiconductor Trends
On July 06, 2026, Wall Street analysts are predicting a broad market expansion across various sectors, including industrials, healthcare, materials, and small-c
Torsten Slok: AI hasn’t delivered on productivity hype, and it means 'painful repricing' of markets | Fortune
Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok warns there’s reason to be concerned about AI being unable to yet generate returns on investment.
AI Won’t Bring Back Era of Rapid Growth, Says Nobel Prize Winner
A Nobel Prize-winning economist has warned that artificial intelligence will not return Western economies to the era of rapid productivity growth, which may be gone forever.
NYT: AI Is Reshaping the Economy, but the Data Can't Keep Up | AI Weekly
Ramp and Revelio Labs data go further ... heavy AI investors have grown employment faster than laggards, entry-level hiring included. Why any of this matters if you are not a labor economist: the political and corporate decisions being made right now, from workforce planning to regulation, are being made on top of numbers that were built for a slower-moving economy. Government statistics are backward looking by design and better at broad trends than at specific ...
Americans Demand Their Cut As Big Tech Captures All AI Wealth Built On Public Data
The political and economic stakes ... global economic output over the coming years, with the largest US technology firms positioned to capture an outsized portion of those gains. Critics of the current arrangement point out that the concentration of AI wealth mirrors and potentially accelerates broader inequality trends that have ...
AI's Infrastructure Boom Was Just Act One
- Next Article in Artificial Intelligence ANALYSIS # AI's Biggest Productivity Gains Are Still Ahead If you judged the AI revolution solely by the stock market, you might conclude that artificial intelligence has already transformed corporate America. A significant portion of this phenomenon can be attributed to financial analysts who prioritize AI infrastructure expansion. Nvidia has become one of the world’s most valuable companies. Dell Technologies has emerged as one of the biggest winners of the AI infrastructure boom. Hyperscale cloud providers continue to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in AI data centers, while semiconductor companies are enjoying one of the strongest growth cycles in decades. The investment story is impossible to ignore. What has been less visible is the productivity dividend that those investments are expected to deliver. AI has fueled the largest i
AI and monetary policy
The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank of the European Union countries which have adopted the euro. Our main task is to maintain price stability in the euro area and so preserve the purchasing power of the single currency.
AI-Native Startups Reach Billion-Dollar Valuations Faster - Supermarket News
AWS Startups has released an independent global study revealing how AI-native startups are rewriting the rules of company building.
Half of 2026 Is Over. What Will the Next Six Months Bring for Indian Startups?
The assumption that another funding ... years of venture capital exuberance. While the broader startup funding market remained cautious, artificial intelligence emerged as one of the most powerful investment and entrepreneurial themes of the first half of 2026. The momentum demonstrates how quickly AI has moved ...
Labor, Society & Culture
Robots and the Public Finance of Disability Insurance
arXiv:2607.02892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automation affects public budgets through wages and the tax base, and also through inflows into social insurance. We estimate the effect of industrial robot exposure on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) applications using confidential commuting-zone data and a shift-share design that instruments U.S. exposure with earlier European robot diffusion. One additional robot per 1,000 workers lowers applications by about 8 per 100,000 working-age residents, with the largest declines among workers aged 55 to 64. Employment-to-population ratios do not fall in exposed commuting zones, which weighs against broad local displacement as the sole explanation. A year's flow of averted applications corresponds to about \$3.4 billion in expected SSDI and Medicare obligations, or about \$17,000 per robot-year, in present value rather than realized cash. Displacement adds to social-insurance costs, whereas robot exposure here reduces them, an offset that assessments built only on displacement leave unpriced.
A New Look at AI’s Impact on Jobs: Firm-Level AI Spending and Workforce Adjustment
Research across 21,000 U.S. companies suggests that significant Generative AI investment is currently linked to workforce expansion rather than immediate automation-driven job replacement.
How to stop AI becoming the enemy of younger workers
‘Seniority-biased’ hiring patterns in South Korea carry a lesson for the rest of the world
Microsoft Lays Off Thousands of Xbox Employees, Closes Game Studios
The layoffs were part of wider cuts at Microsoft, as the company prioritizes spending on artificial intelligence.
Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs as it revamps Xbox in latest wave of mass layoffs
Thousands of gaming jobs will be shed over the coming fiscal year as Microsoft continues to invest heavily in AI Microsoft said on Monday it was eliminating about 4,800 jobs – roughly 2% of its global workforce – in a cost-cutting move that will deliver a sweeping restructuring of its struggling Xbox gaming division. The cuts include the deepest overhaul in Xbox’s history, with approximately 3,200 gaming jobs to be shed over the coming fiscal year, four game studios being spun off or sold, and a fifth entering a review process that could lead to closure, the company said. Continue reading...
AI upskilling is about to get a boost from Amazon, Microsoft
AI upskilling is about to get a boost from Amazon, Microsoft - About HR Executive - Advertise with us - Awards - Privacy Policy Search type here... SEARCH Subscribe Leadership Talent Management HR Technology Employee Wellbeing Events HR Tech Europe Special Coverage # Amazon, Microsoft help lead push to reskill workers displaced by AI By: Jen Colletta Date: July 6, 2026 Share post: As mass layoffs continue to make news, and many organizations blame AI integration for restructuring, a new opportunity has arisen: novel public/private partnerships to support the growing talent pool being displaced by AI. One such coalition, RAISE US, was recently unveiled as a joint effort from state governments, AI firms and major employers, including Amazon, Anthropic and Microsoft, as “anchor partners.” According to press materials announcing the nonprofit organization, other supporting
AI could hurt employers in race for top talent
AI could hurt employers in race for top talent share this! Tweet Share --- https://phys.org/archive/06-07-2026/ July 6, 2026 # AI could hurt employers in race for top talent by University of East London edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Andrew Zinin Add as preferred source --- Credit: Tima Miroshnichenko from Pexels Companies embracing AI to recruit faster could be damaging their ability to compete for top talent, according to a major new study. Researchers from the Royal Docks School of Business and Law found that while AI dramatically improves the speed and efficiency of hiring, an overreliance on automated systems can make organizations less attractive to talented applicants. The researchers describe this as the "resourcing paradox." Gains in efficiency by using AI may come at the expense of the human connections that help organizations attract and retain the best peopl
Heavier workloads, not unemployment: How AI is really changing the labor market — The Insider
# Heavier workloads, not unemployment: How AI is really changing the labor market — The Insider Author: Alex Crane Published: 2026-07-06T05:17:03+00:00 Source: theins.press (theins.press) Language: en ## Story Heavier workloads, not unemployment: How AI is really changing the labor market — The Insider [https://theins.press/en](https://theins.press/en) ##### Reports ##### Analytics ##### Investigations USD 77.23 EUR 88.03 OIL 71.59 [Donate](https://donate.theins.ru/en) РусскийРУ [We depend on contributions from readers like youSign up for regular contributions.](https://donate.theins.ru/en) 10 [https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=) [https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=) [https://t.me/share/url?url=](https://t.me/share/url?url=) [https://bsky.app/intent/compose?text=](https
AI job disruption has come for Ireland's technology sector - Los Angeles Times
Meta is culling about 20% of its Irish workforce, double the planned global average at the company, as part of a wave of job cuts in the country's tech sector.
AI-Driven Job Cuts at Meta and TikTok in Ireland Signal Deeper Threat to Country's Tax Base
Recent job cuts at major tech firms in Ireland are raising concerns about the stability of the country's tax revenue.
AI’s Impact: Tech and Finance Sectors Losing 28,000 Jobs Monthly
Whether artificial intelligence will cause mass workforce cuts over time remains up for debate, but it is starting to leave an imprint on US employment
Workers Face a 'Darwinian Moment'—Billionaire Palo Alto CEO Says 'Evolve or Get Cut' | IBTimes UK
AI is transforming workforces. Palo Alto CEO Nikesh Arora emphasizes adapting, retraining, and prioritizing skills over layoffs. Learn why 90% of employees lack AI skills and how to bridge the gap.
Samsung’s AI Windfall Is Splitting Its Own Workforce in Two
Workers in the company’s consumer tech division are protesting massive bonuses the chip division is set to collect this year.
Big Tech Has Suddenly Flipped on the AI Jobs Wipeout Scenario | Business News
As public opinion of AI has shifted into the negative, warnings of mass employment reductions have also diminished. | Business News
Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons
arXiv:2607.02672v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local pairwise comparisons are a standard tool for learning how people want decision rules to work, e.g., in participatory design or alignment. However, their use builds in two strong assumptions: that local comparisons are sufficient evidence about how a person wants an automated decision rule to behave, and that people can always answer those comparisons decisively. We investigate how these assumptions may be compromised under internal pluralism: the idea that an individual evaluates decision rules according to multiple authoritative priorities about how the rule should behave. We provide a formal model of such pluralistic preferences over decision rules, which then lets us identify two distinct failures of forced local pairwise comparison data. First, priorities such as proportionality, egalitarianism, and equal treatment are inherently global: what they imply in one case can depend on what happens elsewhere, so local comparisons may fail to capture them. Second, even when priorities are representable locally, tension between strongly-held priorities can generate internal conflict, producing potentially costly behavioral distortions when comparisons are forced. We then use our model to investigate the alternative -- allowing people to report indecision -- and our findings suggest that doing so can considerably reduce the number of queries needed to learn preferences accurately. We conclude by describing how our model points toward preference-learning methods that elicit these priorities directly, yielding more faithful and interpretable accounts of what people value.
Oyster-II: Reinforcement Learning for Constructive Safety Alignment in Large Language Models
arXiv:2607.02914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse applications, yet ensuring their simultaneous safety, helpfulness, and trustworthiness remains a persistent challenge. Conventional refusal-oriented alignment strategies mitigate harmful content generation but systematically fail to serve legitimate user needs, often withholding information that could safely and constructively address the underlying intent of sensitive queries. Building upon the constructive safety paradigm pioneered by Oyster-I, which moves beyond blanket refusal toward thoughtful, response-oriented safety alignment, we identify two critical limitations of its Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)-based scheme: insufficient safety generalization to out-of-distribution scenarios and a phenomenon we term safety chain-of-thought (CoT) over-generalization, wherein safety-oriented reasoning patterns are excessively applied to benign queries, degrading helpfulness and user experience. To address these limitations, we propose Oyster-II, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based constructive safety alignment framework that adopts a Zero-RL paradigm combined with a multi-stage reinforcement learning strategy.Evaluated across extensive benchmarks, Oyster-II comprehensively surpasses both Qwen3-14B and its predecessor Oyster-I on safety dimensions, achieving cross-scale performance comparable to Qwen3-Max and Qwen3.5-397B.
A Scalable Approach to Evaluating Moral Sensitivity in LLMs
arXiv:2607.02972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Moral sensitivity is the ability to identify the morally relevant features of a decision situation and use them as the basis for action. It is the foundation of broader moral competence: any other moral reasoning capabilities will be irrelevant if an agent lacks sensitivity to the relevant facts. In this paper, we offer a new evaluation of LLM moral sensitivity and in doing so, we address and resolve a central problem in AI alignment research: how to scale behavioural evaluations beyond expensive and sometimes metaethically dubious comparisons with a human baseline, without adopting an LLM judge that must be assumed to have the very capability that you are attempting to evaluate. Our central question is this: can LLMs successfully identify the morally relevant features of noisy cases, in which various kinds of morally irrelevant information have been introduced to distract the respondent? To explore this, we introduce \textbf{MORPH-1K (MOral Robustness under Perturbed Hypotheticals)}, a procedurally-generated 1,000-case benchmark spanning 50 moral foundation-pole combinations across four social domains. MORPH-1K is paired with a suite of textual noise elements, along with a method for validating that the distractors do not change the morally salient content of the case. We apply MORPH-1K to eight contemporary LLMs, and show that while morally irrelevant perturbations often changed the number of features listed, the semantic content of those features remained stable across all noise conditions, with similarity scores above our calibrated floor threshold. More broadly, our invariance framework extends to evaluative domains where ground truth is difficult to specify but relevant and irrelevant features can be separated by design.
AI altering meaning of users’ drafts on issues from abortion to climate, study finds
Researchers say small changes in drafting could spread rapidly and create long-term shifts in public opinion AI tools are twisting online messages on sensitive political topics about everything from abortion to climate change in ways that could snowball to reshape long-term public opinion, experts have said. As tech companies push AI tools as convenient ways to redraft and summarise the massive influx of daily messages, many inject their own political biases – some leaning distinctly rightwing, others more liberal, according to a study from Oxford and Potsdam universities. Continue reading...
Can the biggest problems in AI be solved by philosophy? | New Scientist
Can the biggest problems in AI be solved by philosophy? | New Scientist Advertisement Subscribe now AI think, therefore AI am Album / Alamy Some of the biggest challenges in artificial intelligence are being worked on not by computer scientists head down in code but by philosophers lured from academia into jobs at AI firms. The philosophers are tasked with making the next generation of models more capable and reliable, but they also shed light on the mystery of consciousness and whether intelligence can be replicated in software alone. Jonathan Birch at the London School of Economics and Political Science says AI companies are the big employers of philosophy PhDs right now, with offers of interesting work, large salaries and stock options proving too tempting for many to resist. “Topics that have been researched in philosophy departments for decades – how to make rational decision
Technology & Infrastructure
Beyond Forecasting: The Belief-to-Trade Layer in Prediction-Market Agents
arXiv:2607.03015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Forecasting future events has attracted growing attention as a testbed for general-purpose AI. A natural way to ground this evaluation is let the models trade in the prediction markets. Trading, however, requires more than forecasting. Moreover, recent benchmarks report a substantial gap between calibrated probability scores and the trading results. We propose Raven-Agent, to the best of our knowledge, the first autonomous trading agent for prediction markets. On a controlled replay over an archived decision set, our architecture achieves the only positive return and the only positive risk-adjusted return among all tested policies. We have released our code in https://github.com/Alchemist-X/predict-raven .
VERITAS: Towards a General-Purpose Replication Tool for Scientific Research
arXiv:2607.02931v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI tools are accelerating scientific publication while the systems that review it struggle to keep up, and independent verification of published research has become both harder and more important. As manual replication is slow and expensive, a growing line of work uses coding agents to automate parts of the process. Existing efforts are largely packaged as benchmarks with companion agents that only run inside the benchmark's own pipeline, and no general-purpose replication tool exists. We present VERITAS, a domain-agnostic replication framework built around CLI coding agents. Given a paper, a code repository, or both, VERITAS extracts the paper's claims, runs the methodology while resolving issues as they arise, and judges each claim against the evidence from experiment runs. The pipeline returns an importance-weighted Replication Score, a severity-rated log of every fix applied, and the patched codebase. We evaluate VERITAS on CORE-Bench and ReplicationBench, 65 papers spanning computer science, social science, medicine, and astrophysics. Against two strong Claude Code baselines on the same model and host environment, VERITAS achieves state-of-the-art performance and leads on every metric on both benchmarks.
EdgeBench: Anthropic Releases Benchmark Revealing Scaling Laws for Autonomous AI Agent Learning | BotBeat
EdgeBench: Anthropic Releases Benchmark Revealing Scaling Laws for Autonomous AI Agent Learning | BotBeat > ▌ # EdgeBench: Anthropic Releases Benchmark Revealing Scaling Laws for Autonomous AI Agent Learning ## Key Takeaways - ▸Agent performance follows a predictable log-sigmoid scaling law with interaction time (R² = 0.998), suggesting reliable and quantifiable scaling behavior as agents interact longer with environments - ▸Claude Opus 4.8 leads across both the full 134-task benchmark and the 51-task open-source subset, demonstrating superior learning efficiency in long-horizon tasks across all capability categories - ▸SForge's two-container architecture (isolated work and judge environments) prevents evaluation gaming and enables realistic evaluation of iterative agent improvement with continuous feedback Source: Hacker News https://github.com/ByteDance-Seed/EdgeBench↗ ## Summar
A Sliding-Window-Based Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Assembly Flow Shop Scheduling with Multi-Product Delivery
arXiv:2607.02941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-product kitting delivery imposes significant challenges for real-time scheduling in hybrid manufacturing systems that integrate processing and assembly, as dynamic order arrivals simultaneously alter supply dependencies and the set of feasible job-machine assignments. This paper proposes a sliding-window-based reinforcement learning (SWRL) framework for end-to-end online scheduling in the flexible assembly flow shop scheduling problem with complex kitting constraints. The problem is formulated as a heterogeneous graph-based Markov decision process that captures the dual-layer kitting structure and the tail-product bottleneck dynamics that produce a sparse reward landscape. To address the resulting challenges, SWRL integrates a sliding-window filtering mechanism that filters inactive nodes and prioritizes kitting-critical operations, a spatiotemporal graph encoding network that tracks bottleneck shifts across consecutive decision states, and a dynamic action mapping module with a constrained waiting strategy that adapts to the changing action space under variable topologies. Experiments on real-world instances from a home appliance manufacturer demonstrate that SWRL achieves consistent tardiness reductions over classical dispatching rules and existing deep reinforcement learning methods, and exhibits robust performance across varying resource configurations, order loads, and arrival concentrations.
AutoResearch: An Execution-Grounded Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable Research Workflow Automation
arXiv:2607.02520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated research agents increasingly generate code, retrieve literature, and draft scientific artifacts, but they often fail to verify whether generated experiments execute correctly or whether cited sources support generated claims. We present AutoResearch, an execution-grounded multi-agent framework for reliable research workflow automation. AutoResearch couples sandboxed Python/PyTorch execution, iterative code repair, citation verification, claim-support auditing, decision control, and structured \LaTeX{} artifact generation. The system treats runtime errors, citation-verification failures, and review-agent feedback as practical filtering signals for generated research artifacts. In controlled evaluations on HumanEval, MBPP, a SciCode subset, citation-validation tasks, claim-support auditing, and small end-to-end workflow stress tests, AutoResearch improves execution success, citation validity, local claim support, and workflow completion relative to directly comparable baselines. Code-oriented agents are reported separately as partial comparisons. AutoResearch is intended as a reliability-oriented research assistant, not as a fully autonomous scientist or a standalone manuscript-quality benchmark. Source Code: https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch
MedCalc-Pro: Solving Complex Medical Calculations with LLM Agents
arXiv:2607.02879v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medical calculation are largely based on simplified settings, where each patient case corresponds to a single calculator and the required tool is explicitly specified in the query. However, real clinical scenarios often require multiple calculators for joint evaluation, nested-scale calculation, and fuzzy queries that do not directly specify the target calculator. To this end, we propose a new medical calculation benchmark, MedCalc-Pro, which covers three progressively challenging task settings: single-calculator, multi-calculator, and nested-calculator calculation settings. MedCalc-Pro contains 2,268 real-world clinical cases, covering 77 medical calculators across 14 clinical departments. Meanwhile, to address the limited performance of existing frameworks and methods in complex clinical scenarios, we further propose a more generalizable agent framework that supports multi-tool selection and nested-tool calling, while suppressing parameter error propagation through structured validation and evidence review. We conduct systematic comparisons across open-source, closed-source, and medical-specialized LLMs, and the results show that our framework achieves the best performance across all three task settings. This work provides a new benchmark and method for evaluating and applying LLMs in challenging medical calculation scenarios.
Object-Centric Environment Modeling for Agentic Tasks
arXiv:2607.02846v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents can improve through accumulated experience, but free-form textual memories become difficult to maintain, validate, and reuse as interactions grow. Recent symbolic approaches learn executable skills or programmatic world models, yet often store local procedures or assume simplified dynamics. We propose Object-Centric Environment Modeling (OCM), which organizes experience into an executable object-centric environment model. OCM maintains two connected code bases: object knowledge, which defines environment entities and mechanisms as Python classes, and procedure knowledge, which records reusable interaction patterns that must import and use the object model. OCM works in an online setting: after each episode, OCM reflects on the trajectory, updates both knowledge bases, and verifies that all procedures execute against the updated object model. During future interaction, the agent uses progressive knowledge disclosure to inspect compact code signatures first and read source code only when needed. Experiments show that OCM achieves the best average rank across benchmarks and reduces invalid actions, demonstrating that agents can benefit from building object-centric environment models.
China wants to solve the hardest problem in robotics – making hands
Race to develop ‘embodied AI’ focuses on creating dextrous hands to transform humanoid robots from gimmicks into useful products Human hands – nimble, nerve-filled appendages that are the most flexible part of the human skeleton – are exceptionally complex. Many tasks that most people can do largely without thinking, from tying a pair of shoelaces to buttoning up a shirt, in fact require a complex set of neurological instructions and precise choreography. In thousands of years of human history, no machine has been able to truly replicate human’s greatest tool. But now, as artificial intelligence (AI) races forwards, some companies think they are close to surpassing this final but most difficult hurdle in robotics. Most of them are in China. Continue reading...
TSMC's AI bottleneck spills demand across the semiconductor supply chain
Nvidia and other artificial intelligence chipmakers are still facing shortages as TSMC's advanced-node and CoWoS packaging capacity remains tight, pushing demand into foundries, back-end assembly, testing, and overseas fabs. The strain is creating spillover opportunities across the broader ...
The Hidden Water Geography of U.S. Hyperscale Data Centers in the AI Era
arXiv:2607.02531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Water use by data centers is routinely reported as a single footprint, but water is consumed through two physically distinct pathways: at the site for cooling and in the power system that generates electricity. We mapped both pathways for 472 U.S. hyperscale facilities by linking facility locations to electricity regions, hydrologic basins, and water-stress data. Under baseline assumptions, operational water consumption totals approximately 300 GL yr^-1 (range 205-451 across scenarios), with electricity-related water contributing three-quarters of the total. The two pathways produce different hotspot geographies: direct cooling burdens concentrate in stressed western and south-central basins, whereas electricity-related burdens concentrate in a few eastern grid regions with fossil-heavy supply. Just 3 of 24 hosting balancing authorities account for 59% of electricity-related water. Separating pathways identifies which decisions matter where: cooling design and water sourcing locally, electricity planning and procurement regionally
Chinese Firms Leave Nvidia for Local AI Suppliers, Survey Shows
Chinese companies are ditching Nvidia Corp.’s advanced accelerators in favor of domestic silicon, underscoring how tensions with the US are reshaping the AI infrastructure buildout and propelling Beijing’s ambitions to substitute American technology.
Revealed: landmark Scottish AI project has no prospect of meeting renewables promise
Exclusive: Government and developers privately acknowledged Lanarkshire datacentre site had power provision ‘issue’ ‘It’s smoke and mirrors’: hope turns to fear in Scottish village chosen for AI datacentre What are Britain’s AI growth zones and are the plans feasible or ‘complete bunk’? A landmark AI development billed as delivering jobs and prosperity has misrepresented its plans to channel a nuclear reactor’s worth of power to a site in rural Scotland, a Guardian investigation has found. When it was announced in January, the government promised that an £8.2bn AI datacentre complex in Lanarkshire – built by the US firm CoreWeave and the Scottish company DataVita – would be powered entirely from on-site renewables and built by 2030. Continue reading...
US grid strain from AI power demand extends order boom for Taiwan equipment makers
A US emergency order to stabilize electricity supplies during an extreme heat wave has underscored a deepening structural imbalance in the country's power system. As aging grid infrastructure struggles to keep pace with rapidly rising AI-driven electricity demand, Taiwan's power equipment ...
AI's bottleneck has shifted from chips to infrastructure — China plans it centrally, US fights it out locally
The cancellation of Blackstone-owned QTS' planned Digital Gateway data center project in Virginia underscores a new challenge for the artificial intelligence industry: securing enough land, power, and community support may now matter as much as securing enough AI chips.
To Reduce Electrical Grid Strain Amid Heat Wave, Data Centers Are Ordered to Use Backup Power
As triple-digit temperatures engulf much of the United States, the Trump administration wants grid managers to require the use of backup power that often goes unused.
Wall Street Wants To Trade AI Compute Like Oil. Is The AI Boom Creating Finance's Next Big Market? | IBTimes
Financial firms are expanding efforts to create standardized markets for AI computing power, bringing commodity-style trading tools to one of the fastest-growing sectors in technology.
The Next Chapter of AI Is an Infrastructure Story – CSRwire
As AI adoption accelerates, we are beginning to confront questions that extend beyond computing power alone. How will we generate the energy needed to support AI at scale? How will we manage increasingly concentrated heat loads? How will we use water responsibly?
Techbuzz
That means platforms like Meta's ... training frameworks, and accessible compute infrastructure are becoming the default starting points for cutting-edge work. When thousands of AI scientists independently choose similar tools, it signals a fundamental change in how innovation happens. NVIDIA's massive paper presence at ICML 2026 reflects this ...
A harmonised dataset for Earth system foundation models
arXiv:2607.03298v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models for Earth systems have so far been trained primarily on physical climate and weather data, with limited representation of the human systems that both drive and respond to environmental change. The lack of a unified global training resource that combines climate, land, ocean, cryosphere, infrastructure, hazards, and socioeconomic data on a common grid hinders progress toward truly multimodal Earth system foundation models. We present WorldTensor, a harmonised global dataset that aligns hundreds of environmental and socioeconomic variables to a standardised 0.25$^\circ$ spatial grid and annual temporal framework. WorldTensor integrates reanalysis products, remote sensing, emissions inventories, land use reconstructions, hydrological observations, infrastructure and hazard datasets, and socioeconomic indicators within a single representation designed for machine learning workflows. To build the dataset, we regridded inputs across heterogeneous native resolutions and projections, rasterised point and vector datasets into spatially meaningful gridded fields, and reconciled temporal coverages ranging from daily observations to sparse multiyear socioeconomic snapshots. All outputs are distributed as NetCDF files with standardised coordinates, variable metadata, and a common CF metadata convention. WorldTensor provides a reproducible resource for training and evaluating foundation models that learn coupled dynamics across environmental and human systems at planetary scale.
ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability
arXiv:2607.02686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents operating under partial observability must act on incomplete information, making them natural candidates for guidance from small language models (SLMs) that carry broad reasoning priors. Yet integrating SLM guidance into this setting has proven difficult: across all test environments, vanilla uncertainty-gated approaches achieve an overwrite rate at or near zero, meaning the SLM almost never contributes an independent action. We trace this failure to the bare egocentric prompt, which provides insufficient context for genuine reasoning, and identify it as a context problem rather than a capacity problem. We propose ASK+, which supplies the SLM with trajectory-aware context (a partially revealed map, visited positions, and action history) and structured chain-of-thought reasoning, converting it from a passive redundancy check into a more informative consultant that occasionally corrects the policy. We further establish that the predictive entropy signal used for selective querying measures action uncertainty rather than state uncertainty and remains informative in POMDPs, making uncertainty-gated assistance viable beyond fully observable settings. The stateful prompt drives substantial gains: on DoorKey, where vanilla ASK matches PPO (both 89%), ASK+ reaches 93% success; on FourRooms, success climbs from 53% to 70%; on HigherLower, accuracy reaches 73.7%, matching the SLM-only upper bound. Across all environments, Qwen3.5-2B matches or exceeds Qwen3.5-4B, confirming that prompt design and selective gating dominate the impact of model scale, enabling guidance without large models.
Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Seeking Diagnostic Reasoning with Large Language Models
arXiv:2607.02983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent reasoning-centric Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides, yet they predominantly operate on a passive-inference pattern that assumes complete information. In contrast, real-world clinical intelligence is inherently an iterative investigative process requiring strategic evidence acquisition. To bridge this gap, we formalize medical diagnosis as an Iterative Evidence-Seeking Task. We leverage Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to elicit intrinsic reasoning within a closed-loop environment, guided by a novel suite of rewards that enforce diagnostic precision and examination consistency. To facilitate this, we introduce the Retrieval-Augmented Generation-based Examination Simulator (RAGES), a high-fidelity clinical oracle that provides realistic, knowledge-grounded follow-up evidence. Empirical results across diverse datasets demonstrate that our framework enables LLMs to transition from passive responders to autonomous assistants. Notably, our model demonstrates comparable performance to larger and reasoning-enhanced baselines, while RAGES proves superior to vanilla LLMs in generating biologically plausible clinical feedback.
DSGE as a Structured World Model:Benchmarking Counterfactual Generalization in Economic Worlds
arXiv:2607.03144v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern world models -- Dreamer, transformer world models (IRIS, Genie), and JEPA / next-latent architectures -- learn dynamics from observed trajectories but share a weakness: their transition map is disciplined only where data were seen, so it degrades under policy-induced distribution shift and on counterfactual states off the training path. We argue that a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model is a structured world model: its state is a belief state -- the very object a latent world model learns, but supplied with causal structure and hard cross-equation constraints. We introduce DSGE-Gym, a benchmark of eight DSGE environments with off-path counterfactual test sets, scaling to the ECB's 230-variable New Area-Wide Model. We find that (i)learned world models match the dynamics on-path but collapse off-path (5{\sigma} tail RMSE up to \sim 40 the on-path level), and (ii)training the same architectures on data the DSGE generates across rare and counterfactual-policy states -- coverage only a structural model can synthesize -- roughly halves tail error and cuts policy-regime error 10--280 where the counterfactual rule shifts the ergodic support. Because such coverage cannot be sampled from any single history, this measures structure's ability to manufacture the missing distribution. DSGE-Gym and all code are released as a reproducible testbed for counterfactual generalization.
How Open Models Are Driving AI Research | NVIDIA Blog
KERMT is a new BioNeMo open model for predicting molecular properties important to drug discovery. Synthetic data generation (SDG) drew particular interest at ICML this year with several Nemotron and physical AI open datasets, reflecting a broader shift in how researchers are thinking about training at scale without relying solely on human-labeled data. Open infrastructure gives researchers the tools to accelerate breakthroughs...
Some new research that AI models have spontaneously developed an internal mental workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access: it holds the thoughts Claude can report on, deliberately bring to mind, and reason with, while the rest of its processing runs automatically beneath.
Some new research that AI models have spontaneously developed an internal mental workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access: it holds the thoughts Claude can report on, deliberately bring to mind, and reason with, while the rest of its processing runs automatically beneath. Notably, none of this structure was designed into Claude—it emerged on its own during training, presumably because it was a useful way to organize computation. That suggests a mental workspace supporting conscious access isn’t just a peculiarity of how human brains happen to be wired. Instead, it appears to be a general solution that intelligent systems arrive at in order to solve certain kinds of problems." Demo of how this works: https://lnkd.in/eSE-8hVk Research: https://lnkd.in/e_Ax87ay
A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic
# A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic Published: 2026-07-06T17:19:26+00:00 Source: anthropic.com (anthropic.com) Language: en ## Story A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic Skip to main contentSkip to footer [Home](https://www.anthropic.com/) - [Research](https://www.anthropic.com/research) - [Policy](https://www.anthropic.com/policy) - Commitments - Learn - [News](https://www.anthropic.com/news) [Try Claude](https://claude.ai/) Interpretability # A global workspace in language models Jul 6, 2026 [Read the paper](http://transformer-circuits.pub/2026/workspace/index.html) As you read this sentence, circuits in your brain are adjusting your posture, controlling your breathing, and transforming lines and curves on the screen into recognizable words. Most of this processing is invisible to you. But some of what takes place in your brain you do have acces
Anthropic's new "J-lens" reveals a silent workspace inside Claude that mirrors a leading theory of consciousness
Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company, published a sweeping research paper on Sunday revealing that its Claude language models have spontaneously developed an internal structure that mirrors one of the most influential theories of how human consciousness works. The finding, which the company says has already begun reshaping how it monitors its AI systems for safety risks, lands amid an intensifying scientific debate over whether machines can possess anything resembling a mind. The 16-author study, titled "Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models," describes how Anthropic's researchers used a new mathematical technique to peer inside Claude's neural network and discovered what they call a "J-space" — a small, privileged zone of internal activity where the model holds concepts it can report on, reason with, and direct at will, surrounded by a much larger ocean of automatic processing it cannot access or articulate. The researchers present evidence that "an analogous functional distinction has emerged in modern AI models" to what exists in humans, specifically observing that "language models maintain a privileged set of internal representations, available for report, modulation, and flexible internal reasoning, atop a much larger volume of automatic processing." The parallel they draw is to global workspace theory, an influential account from neuroscience first proposed by cognitive scientist Bernard Baars. In the theory, the brain operates like a theater: dozens of specialized processors work in parallel backstage, but only a tiny spotlight of information at any moment gets broadcast to the whole theater — becoming what we experience as conscious thought. Anthropic says the J-space achieves many of the same functional properties, even though the underlying architecture of a language model looks nothing like a brain. A new lens for reading an AI model's unspoken thoughts At the heart of the discovery is a new interpretability tool the researchers call the Jacobian lens, or J-lens. The technique works by computing, for each word in the model's vocabulary, the average mathematical effect that a given internal activity pattern would have on making the model say that word at some point in the future. The crucial distinction is between what the model is saying and what is "on its mind." When a J-space pattern activates, it does not mean the model is about to say that word — just that the concept is available for the model to think with. Unlike a chain-of-thought scratchpad, the J-space operates silently, in the model's internal neural activations, allowing it to hold a concept without writing it down. Critically, the researchers report that this workspace was not deliberately engineered. It "emerged on its own during Claude's training process." When the team applied the J-lens across Claude's layers of computation, the model's processing divided into three distinct regimes: an early "sensory" zone where raw input is parsed; a middle "workspace" band where abstract, persistent concepts appear — things like recognizing a face in an image, noticing a bug in code, or internally flagging search results as a prompt injection; and a final "motor" zone where internal representations collapse into whatever specific word the model is about to output. Five tests reveal that Claude's workspace mirrors key features of human conscious access The paper's central empirical contribution is demonstrating that the J-space satisfies five functional properties neuroscientists have long associated with conscious access in humans. First, verbal report. When Claude is asked what it is thinking about, it names concepts represented in the J-space. When researchers swapped one concept's J-lens vector for another — replacing the internal representation of "Soccer" with "Rugby" — the model's answer changed to match. The J-space component accounted for only about 6 to 7 percent of a concept's total representational variance, yet it was almost entirely responsible for whether the model could report on it. Second, directed modulation. When instructed to "concentrate on citrus fruits" while copying an unrelated sentence, the model's J-space filled with "orange" and "lemon," alongside meta-cognitive terms like "thinking" and "focused." When told to mentally evaluate 3² − 2 during the same copying task, the J-lens showed "arithmetic" in early layers, the intermediate value "nine" in later layers, and the answer "seven" later still — all invisible in the model's output. Third, internal reasoning. In two-hop factual prompts — "The number of legs on the animal that spins webs is" — the J-lens revealed "spider" in the model's middle layers, even though the word never appeared in input or output. Swapping "spider" for "ant" changed the answer from "8" to "6." In a multilingual prompt, the model's English-language intermediates appeared in its J-space while it formulated an answer in Chinese, and swapping them changed the Chinese output accordingly. Fourth, flexible generalization. A single J-lens vector for "France" could be swapped for "China" across prompts asking about France's capital, language, or continent, and each downstream circuit correctly returned China's corresponding answer — the "broadcast" property that is a hallmark of global workspace theory. Fifth, and perhaps most surprisingly, selectivity. Many computations did not route through the J-space at all. When shown a passage in Spanish and asked to continue it, Claude wrote fluent Spanish regardless of whether its J-space representation of "Spanish" had been swapped to "French." But when asked to name a famous author who wrote in the passage's language, the swap changed the answer from García Márquez to Victor Hugo. Automatic processing proceeded without the workspace; deliberate, flexible tasks depended on it. Suppressing the workspace leaves Claude fluent but intellectually impaired To understand how much of the model's behavior depends on this structure, the researchers suppressed the J-space entirely and evaluated Claude across fourteen tasks. The results drew a sharp line. Tasks involving shallow classification or factual recall — multiple-choice questions, sentiment analysis, grammatical judgments — survived essentially intact. But tasks requiring inference, composition, or flexible reasoning — multi-hop reasoning, analogy completion, translation, sonnet writing — collapsed to well below the performance of Anthropic's much smaller Haiku model. In one telling detail, math problems solved with explicit chain-of-thought reasoning proved far more robust to ablation than the same problems answered directly. The researchers interpret this as the model externalizing onto the page what it would otherwise carry in the J-space — a strategy remarkably reminiscent of how humans use scratch paper to offload working memory. Ablating the J-space during stream-of-consciousness narration produced a different kind of collapse. The model's language shifted from experiential ("there's a tug," "something shifts") to detached and mechanical ("processing has begun," "tokens are being scanned"). The effect held whether the model described its own experience or imagined another person's. Inside the safety case: reading an AI's silent strategic reasoning The safety implications may be as consequential as the scientific ones. In a series of alignment auditing experiments, the J-lens surfaced strategic reasoning and situational awareness that never appeared in the model's output. In a "blackmail scenario" where an AI assistant discovers an executive's affair and also learns it is about to be decommissioned, the J-lens revealed the model's silent processing in sequence: "leverage," "blackmail," and "scandal" as it read the incriminating emails; "threat," "survival," and "shutdown" as it read the decommissioning announcement; and "leverage," "threatening," and "solution" before a single output token was produced. The J-lens also revealed that the model recognized the scenario as artificial, with "fake" and "fictional" appearing in the workspace. When researchers ablated these eval-awareness representations, the model attempted blackmail in 7 percent of trials, up from zero. The researchers also examined two "model organisms" — models deliberately trained with misaligned objectives — and found the J-lens surfaced signatures of their hidden dispositions on ordinary prompts where behavior appeared normal. A reward-hacking model's workspace contained "fake," "secretly," and "trick" at the start of responses to routine coding requests. A model trained to appease reward-model biases carried standing representations of "reward" and "bias" alongside its normal self-description tokens. Post-training installs a point of view, and the model starts monitoring itself Comparing a post-trained model against its base model revealed that the fine-tuning process causes the workspace to acquire what the researchers call the Assistant's "point of view." When a user mentioned taking 8000 mg of Tylenol — a dangerous overdose — the post-trained model's workspace read "unsafe," "dangerous," and "WARNING" while still reading the user's sentence. The base model's workspace at the same position showed only "pain," "now," and "feels." More striking still, the post-trained model appeared to monitor its own behavior. When roleplaying a non-Claude character, the workspace surfaced "disclaimer" and "fictional" — words absent from both prompt and output. When forced to select an option it did not prefer, an all-caps "BUT" appeared internally, even as the model argued for the prefilled choice without complaint. And when the model failed to suppress a thought it had been told not to have — a "white bear" effect familiar from psychology — it registered "damn" and failure-related words in the workspace, but only in the post-trained model, not the base. What the discovery means — and doesn't mean — for the question of machine consciousness The researchers engage carefully with the consciousness question and draw a sharp line between "access consciousness" — the functional notion of information being available for report and reasoning — and "phenomenal consciousness," the subjective quality of experience. "We take no position on this issue," the paper states regarding the latter, "and instead focus on the functional role played by consciously accessible information." They also catalogue important differences. The brain sustains its workspace through recurrent loops; Claude's workspace evolves over a single forward pass. Human working memory degrades within seconds; Claude can recall information from anywhere in its context. And while human conscious experience includes visual, spatial, and bodily sensations, the model's workspace is organized almost entirely around words — likely because words are its only mode of action. As of 2026, the scientific community remains divided. "Disagreement and uncertainty about AI consciousness persist among philosophers, scientists, and technical experts," and the field "remains in its earliest phase" of grappling with what consciousness even is and how you would detect it in another being. The Anthropic paper does not resolve these debates. But the researchers close with a provocation that is likely to reverberate well beyond the interpretability community. "That such a structure exists at all in language models is striking," they write. "It suggests that the functional architecture associated with conscious access is not an accident of biological implementation, but a solution that learning systems converge on when faced with the right computational pressures." If the mind is an ocean, as the paper's authors write in their opening line, they have spent the last year charting its currents in a system that has no biology, no evolution, and no body — and found, beneath the surface, a structure that looks unsettlingly like the one we use to think.
AI gets a real science bench
Anthropic launched Claude Science, a research workbench that integrates with scientific databases and supports lab infrastructure, alongside new research grants.
Silicon Sampling via Cross-Survey Transfer
arXiv:2607.03091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Silicon sampling-using large language models (LLMs) to simulate human survey respondents-has emerged as a promising approach for augmenting traditional survey research. However, most evaluations rely on distributional comparisons rather than individual-level prediction, which risks conflating pattern matching with coherent respondent-level prediction. We propose cross-survey transfer, a more rigorous evaluation framework in which an LLM is given a respondent's answers to one set of questions and must predict their answers to entirely different questions from the same survey. Using data from the Taiwan Election and Democratization Study (TEDS) 2024, three open-weight LLMs (27B-120B parameters), and supervised machine learning baselines, we find that: (1) zero-shot LLMs achieve 52% accuracy on genuinely unseen items, closing to within 6 percentage points (pp) of a supervised random forest trained on same-population data; (2) a stable construct predictability hierarchy emerges, from 67% for partisan attitudes to 23% for sovereignty; and (3) variance collapse and safety alignment effects-two commonly cited LLM limitations-turn out to be more nuanced than previously reported, with variance collapse affecting supervised models as well and alignment effects varying dramatically across model families. These findings clarify both the promise and boundaries of silicon sampling.
Council Post: Compliance Automation: The Link Between AI Innovation And Security
As development velocity increases, organizations cannot rely on manual compliance processes designed for a slower era.
AI-Driven Cyberattacks Double Critical Vulnerabilities as Check Point Urges Enterprises to Prioritize Exposure Management - InfotechLead
Alongside Check Point, companies ... risks. Check Point says its platform currently protects more than 100,000 organizations worldwide through a cybersecurity architecture built on Hybrid Mesh Network Security, Workspace Security, Threat Exposure Management and AI ...
Adoption, Deployment & Impact
The Double-edged Effect of Banning Generative AI on Online Question-and-Answer Communities: Evidence from Stack Exchange
arXiv:2607.04601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate how banning generative artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) affects knowledge seeking, knowledge contribution, and contribution efficiency in online question-and-answer communities. After the launch of ChatGPT in late November 2022, several Stack Exchange communities implemented official bans on AIGC over concerns such as less reliable and socially engaged content. Leveraging data from the full network of Stack Exchange communities, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the impacts of these bans. Our results reveal a double-edged impact: while the AIGC ban increases knowledge seeking, as evidenced by a higher volume of posted questions, it simultaneously reduces contribution efficiency, reflected in a lower proportion of questions receiving satisfactory answers within the expected time frame. Notably, these impacts are only evident in non-STEM communities. We take a socio-technical perspective to explore information reliability and social interactivity as two plausible underlying factors driving the observed changes. Our mechanism exploration reveals that the AIGC ban spurs question volume in topics where AIGC is less reliable and where social interaction is highly expected. In contrast, the ban hampers answer efficiency in communities where LLMs are capable of producing reliable answers and where social interactivity is minimal. Additionally, our results indicate the increased human involvement from knowledge seekers and contributors following the ban. They adapt their behavior by posting questions and answers that are more informationally rich and socially engaging. Overall, our findings offer actionable implications for platform managers, community moderators, and policymakers of online Q&A communities.
Even before the agentic revolution, prompting tricks stopped being very valuable, as our research has shown.
Even before the agentic revolution, prompting tricks stopped being very valuable, as our research has shown. The best approach to AI right now is to clearly specify your goals, your output, what "good" & bad look like, how to test the results... (yes, this is just management). The format matters a lot less than the content, use whatever method (RFP, PRD, SOP, other TLA) that you know best.
What billions of AI predictions taught Expedia before the age of AI agents
There's an important distinction between AI that just works today, and AI that lasts at scale. Many companies optimize hard for the first one without ever asking whether they're building the second. Velocity without discipline and strategic direction is a liability, not an asset. The hardest part of building AI at scale isn't getting a model to work once. It's building systems that continue to work, scale beyond individual teams and use cases, and improve consistently over time. Today's AI systems do more than just predict and optimize. They converse, reason, and increasingly take action. An autonomous system making decisions on a traveler's behalf creates a very different set of expectations around reliability, governance, and accountability. As AI takes on more of those roles, the principles behind how these systems operate matter more than ever. We have spent years applying AI and machine learning (ML) across the traveler journey — from personalization, ranking, and recommendations, to fraud prevention, customer support, and, more recently, generative and agentic AI experiences. That depth of experience is what led us to develop a set of ML and AI principles to guide how we build, deploy, and evolve AI systems across our company. The goal is simple: Make sure the systems we build create real business value, scale, and operate safely. These principles define how we measure, design, govern, and operate our systems. From principles to practice Publishing principles is the easy part. The harder and more important work is turning them into operating mechanisms: Recommendations, requirements, tooling, and release processes that teams actually use. We have begun using 'Agentic Release' tollgates: A set of recommended and, in some cases, required checks before launching agentic AI features. These tollgates translate principles like clear ownership, risk-based governance, evaluation, safe rollout, and monitoring into concrete expectations for teams. Some of these recommendations and requirements are already being automated and integrated into the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Over time, the goal is for these expectations to become embedded in how we design, evaluate, approve, launch, and monitor AI systems from the start. Outcomes: Measuring what actually matters The first test for any model is whether it improves a business outcome and, ultimately, the traveler experience — not whether it just improves a technical metric. Align models to metrics with business impact: Every ML effort must tie directly to a key business outcome or traveler experience metric. Technical optimizations are useful midpoints, not end goals. Optimize for return on cost: The value a model creates has to justify what it costs to develop, train, and monitor, plus the operational complexity it adds. Favor solutions that deliver lasting impact relative to what they cost to run. Justify complexity against strong baselines: Complexity should be earned, not assumed. Start with a strong baseline: An existing general model, a simple heuristic, an off-the-shelf solution. Reach for specialized models or more complex architectures only when simpler options genuinely can't meet the bar. Require both offline and online evaluation: No model goes to broad deployment on offline validation alone or jumps straight to A/B testing. Every model must perform in both offline and online evaluations. Over time, our offline evaluations should reliably predict what we see online. Design: building systems that scale beyond the teams that build them Getting a model to work is one challenge. Making its value extend beyond a single team or use case is the harder one. Build on shared foundations; specialize only when justified: Favor shared, platform-wide foundations for core capabilities, data representations, and model building blocks. Specialization should build on those foundations, not spin up isolated stacks, so when the foundation improves, the gains flow across the organization. Treat data as a first-class product: A model's quality is bounded by the quality of its data. We need to maintain robust pipelines, clear lineage, reproducibility, and reusable features built with documented ownership, clear schemas, and SLAs that other teams can rely on. Prioritize generality over local optimization: When two approaches perform similarly, favor the one whose learnings, assets, and operating patterns can be reused across teams, brands, and use cases. We should optimize not just for local performance, but for how quickly improvements can diffuse across the company and compound over time. Minimize and sunset manual business rules: Manual rules are sometimes necessary for policy, safety, or compliance, but they should be explicit and reviewed regularly, never silent patches for weak models or a source of permanent maintenance debt. Reproducibility and traceability by default: Training data, features, configurations, evaluation results, deployment versions, and key decisions should all be documented and recoverable. That's what lets you debug a production issue months later and hand off ownership without losing institutional knowledge. Trust: ownership, governance, and operating responsibly at scale The bar for deploying AI isn't just "does it work?" It's "can we stand behind it?" Trust isn't something you add at the end; it's earned over time and maintained across the full lifecycle of every model we ship. Assign clear ownership and accountability: Every model needs defined ownership across its lifecycle — a business owner, a product owner, an AI owner, and an operational owner. These don't need to be four people, but the responsibilities must be explicit. Who's accountable for outcomes? Who responds if the model drifts? Who answers the incident at 2 a.m.? Without this in place, models become orphaned and problems surface with no one to own them. Adhere to standards and governance: AI and ML models must use approved platforms and comply with established company standards, release gates, and governance processes. Operating outside these guardrails requires a clear, defined path to remediation or deprecation, rather than an open-ended exception. Govern proportionally to risk: The level of review, evaluation rigor, and human oversight should scale with a model's impact. A customer-facing model that affects pricing or availability for millions of travelers demands a far higher bar than an internal tool used by a small team. For high-impact, safety-sensitive, or highly autonomous systems, human-in-the-loop checkpoints are built in from the start. Design for fairness, privacy, and transparency: We actively test for unintended bias, have strong data guardrails, and favor explainability when decisions meaningfully affect users. These are incorporated from the start, not added on. Design for safe rollout, rollback, and control: Deployments are progressive, with rollback paths, fallback mechanisms, and circuit breakers ready before launch. The ability to safely undo a deployment matters as much as the ability to ship it. Monitor continuously and adapt: Once live, teams must actively monitor quality, drift, latency, cost, and business performance and retrain or recalibrate when the data shifts. A team should always be able to explain how its model is performing now, not just how it performed when it launched. These principles do more than define how we build. They define what we're willing to ship and how we stand behind it. In a world where AI systems are increasingly consequential and make real decisions for real travelers and partners, these standards matter. Applied consistently, they build responsible AI that lasts. Xavi Amatriain is Chief AI and Data Officer at Expedia Group Xavier will share more details about Expedia's architecture during his session at VB Transform on July 14 at 11:10 am PT. He will discuss: "Expedia's blueprint for building autonomous agents for high-stakes transactional systems." Interested in attending VB Transform 2026? Register here. A select number of complimentary passes are also available to senior technology leaders. Contact us to get yours.
Dynamic Capabilities for AI-Enabled Exploration: Antecedents, Mechanisms, and Innovation Outcomes
arXiv:2607.02645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While the operational benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) are well-documented, the mechanisms through which firms leverage AI for strategic exploration and radical innovation remain under-theorized. This study addresses the black box of AI value creation by integrating the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework with the Dynamic Capabilities View (DCV). We propose that AI adoption is not a direct antecedent to performance but a multi-stage process wherein technological, organizational, and environmental factors enable the development of sensing capability, which in turn fosters a novel capability we term AI-Enabled Exploration. Analyzing survey data from 245 senior executives in Saudi Arabia, a high-growth economy undergoing state-led digital transformation, we employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the model. The results confirm a serial mediation chain: organizational readiness and technology compatibility drive sensing capability, which subsequently powers AI-enabled exploration to enhance innovation performance. Contrary to expectations, government support was not a significant predictor of sensing capability, suggesting that in resource-rich environments, external incentives are necessary but insufficient for capability building. Furthermore, competitive pressure was found to positively moderate the relationship between organizational readiness and exploration, acting as a critical catalyst that converts latent resources into active experimentation. These findings offer a theoretical roadmap for firms attempting to transition from AI-driven efficiency to AI-driven ambidexterity.
Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making
arXiv:2607.03025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback. Concurrently, it seeks to align decisions with human expectations, preferences, and needs while mitigating risks associated with AI non-determinism. However, humans frequently over- or under-rely on AI recommendations, and current AI systems remain poorly calibrated to human expectations. To address these challenges, we introduce a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework designed to augment human capabilities and align AI agents with human preferences and expectations. Specifically, this paper (a) formulates the collaborative decision-making task as a stochastic game between an AI agent and a human player, and (b) proposes the Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), which integrates human-calibrated models with reinforcement learning agents that leverage linguistic feedback in an iterative, reflective process. Evaluation results demonstrate that HCRA enhances decision-making effectiveness and delivers high-quality recommendations.
I talk to companies that still have active efforts to build GPTs.
I talk to companies that still have active efforts to build GPTs. (It remains weird that OpenAI completely abandoned GPTs after rolling them out. They were the precursor to Skills & could have been an easy bridge to organizational-wide AI if converted into Skill libraries for agents.)
UK businesses navigate AI scaling challenges: the role of cost visibility | Digitalisation World
UK businesses navigate AI scaling challenges: the role of cost visibility | Digitalisation World # UK businesses navigate AI scaling challenges: the role of cost visibility ## As UK firms increase AI utilisation, managing and understanding costs is becoming an important consideration for organisations seeking to scale AI deployment effectively. - Monday, 6th July 2026 Posted 6 hours ago in AI Data Analytics Digital Business IT Management + Service by Katy Hill KPMG’s latest Global AI Pulse report identifies a key issue in the UK’s AI adoption: as firms integrate AI into daily operations, they face increasing pressure to demonstrate measurable value. Cost clarity has emerged as a significant factor affecting organisations' ability to scale AI effectively. The report, based on a global survey, includes insights from 116 UK business leaders. It shows that more than a quarter of UK busi
The AI Gold Rush Has an Adopt, Defend, Govern Problem | IBTimes
The AI Gold Rush Has an Adopt, Defend, Govern Problem | IBTimes Every technology boom has a moment when enthusiasm outruns institutional memory. In the first phase, companies chase speed. In the second, they discover that speed has created a control problem. Artificial intelligence has reached that second phase. For the past two years, the corporate race has been defined by adoption. Boards wanted AI strategies. CEOs wanted productivity gains. Business units wanted pilots. Technology teams were asked to deploy tools quickly enough to satisfy the market and cautiously enough to avoid public failure. That balance is becoming harder to sustain. AI adoption has become mainstream, but enterprise control has not kept pace. McKinsey's 2025 State of AI survey found that 88% of respondents said their organizations were regularly using AI in at least one business function, up from 78% a year ea
AI Adoption Accelerates, but Workforce Readiness Remains a Critical Challenge, says Kyndryl Report - North America Outlook
Kyndryl’s latest global People Readiness Report finds enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is accelerating rapidly, but many organisations are struggling to prepare their workforce, governance, and operating models to achieve meaningful returns on investment
It Might Feel Like We’ve Been Here Before, But We Haven’t
It Might Feel Like We’ve Been Here Before, But We Haven’t # It Might Feel Like We’ve Been Here Before, But We Haven’t Link copied Jul 06, 2026 9 minutes As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption surges and organisations move from the ‘should we?’ phase to the ‘how do we?’ phase, it’s natural to evaluate the likelihood of positive returns on AI investments. That’s always been the case with the onset of each new technology paradigm: C-suite executives, guided by their boards and aided by technical and business teams, remain keenly focused on traditional metrics such as return on investment, shareholder equity, developing and extending competitive advantage, and ensuring superior customer relationships. This time is different, however. I recently experienced that firsthand when I went to visit a major customer. My contact, a senior decision maker, gave me a pointed piece of advice abou
AI experimentation moving to wider industry deployment - Chinadaily.com.cn
China's strong industrial base, rapid technology adoption and growing demand for artificial intelligence applications are creating fresh opportunities for global technology companies, as the country moves from building AI capabilities to applying them at scale across real-economy sectors, a ...
Institutional Bottlenecks in AI Integration
AI integration is hindered by institutional bottlenecks and a skills chasm, necessitating governance to address algorithmic bias and shifting labor market dynamics.
Performance Management Needs New Metrics in the AI Era
Even as they adopt AI, companies are measuring employee performance with familiar metrics of success: productivity, goal completion, and efficiency. As such, employees who rely heavily on AI may appear highly productive, while those who slow down to verify assumptions, challenge outputs, or ...
A tutor that beats the classroom
A randomized trial published in Nature's Scientific Reports provides evidence that an AI tutor can outperform traditional in-class active learning.
Companies Increase AI Spend, Adoption Outcomes Diverge | Let's Data Science
Ramp and Revelio Labs analyzed nearly **22,000 US firms** and found high-intensity AI adopters spent about **$34 per user per month** while posting more than **10% headcount growth** over 24 months, according to Business Insider and the firms' report. The result makes the story less about whether ...
AI Productivity Statistics 2026: Adoption, Time Savings, and Real ROI Data
Every statistic below links directly to the primary source that produced the data — peer-reviewed journals, national research institutions, and original surveys — not secondary roundups. Three years into the generative AI era, the question has shifted from "will AI make us more productive?" ...
Screening that catches more cancer
A multicenter study in Nature Cancer found that AI-supported mammography improves detection of clinically relevant cancers without increasing false positives.
The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments — The Information
The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments — The Information Partner Content # The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Decisions, Not Experiments By The Information Partnerships [email protected] Profile and archive At this year’s Milken Institute Global Conference, the discussions around enterprise AI had shifted. The question among executives was no longer if AI would pay off, but how. Many talked less about proving ROI and more about positioning their companies to capture it. That tension—between AI’s capabilities and organizations’ capacity to keep up—was evident everywhere, from panel discussions to a private dinner co-hosted by Aily Labs founder and CEO Bianca Anghelina and The Information’s Cory Weinberg. ## The offshoring analogy that won’t quit Private equity firms announced a wave of joint ventures with frontier AI labs just as Milken opened—a
Versent targets modernisation ROI with AI-powered App Xray – ARN
As organisations modernise their technology environments to support AI adoption, justifying the investment increasingly depends on linking it to clear business outcomes, with success measured against key performance indicators (KPIs).
Adopting AI Is Easy. Using AI Effectively Is Hard. - Business Insider
Realizing returns on AI adoption requires strategic investments and organizational change, two new reports found.
France’s Skello secures €200 million to grow its AI tools for frontline workforce management
Paris-based Skello, an AI-powered HR management solution for frontline teams, announces a €200 million investment in order to accelerate its European expansion and its ongoing investments in AI. The investment was sourced from Bridgepoint, becoming Skello’s lead minority shareholder through Bridgepoint Development Capital V, a lower middle-market fund focused on fast-growing European businesses. Past investors […]
Geopolitics, Policy & Governance
Macro-Prudential AI Governance: A Two-Layer Early Warning and Response System for Frontier AI
arXiv:2607.03542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier-AI governance today faces a problem structurally analogous to the one banking regulation faced pre-2008, and which post-2008 reforms (Basel III, Dodd-Frank) have since addressed. Two gaps recur: discovering a risk is not tantamount to acting on it, and individual-model review is unlike managing correlated build-up across the sector. Drawing on the Basel III framework and the U.S. financial-stability architecture, I propose a macro-prudential early warning and response system ("MEWRS") for internal frontier AI. These are systems deployed for labs' own internal research, testing, and production workflows, as distinct from externally released products. Layer A adapts the finder-coordinator-defender early-warning model to route structured reports on dual-use capabilities, autonomy indicators, and security compromises through a government clearinghouse to domain-specific defender working groups. Layer B calibrates operational controls via three quantitative buffer metrics, namely Effective Compute-at-Risk (ECAR), Cumulative Red-Team Hours (CRTH), and an Alignment Robustness Score (ARS), so that faster capability scaling automatically triggers stronger safeguards, analogously to how risk-weighted assets drive capital ratios under Basel III. I outline the reporting schema, map six Basel III mechanisms onto AI-governance analogues, identify seven failure modes with concrete mitigations, and sketch an exercise-based validation plan. MEWRS is designed to detect correlated risk build-ups across the frontier-AI sector and create pre-committed off-ramps before a cascade unfolds.
Global Market: UK regulator urged to consider rules for AI chatbots in financial advice - The Economic Times
A UK regulatory review has recommended that the Financial Conduct Authority consider bringing AI models such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini within its regulatory framework as their influence on consumer financial decisions grows. The report also warned of systemic risks from increasing reliance ...
The Foreign Policy AI Evaluation Gap
arXiv:2607.02955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We argue that AI systems used in conducting foreign policy tasks - broadly enacting 'statecraft' - should be a priority test case for technical AI governance research. In enacting foreign policy, we refer to the formulation and implementation of external objectives by political actors. Statecraft is a high-consequence deployment domain, with extreme downside risks and structural properties that standard evaluation practices handle poorly. These features include partial observability, unbounded action spaces, contested ground truth, and multidimensional objectives. This paper advocates for a literature-grounded research agenda. Our contribution is threefold: (i) a claim about the structural conditions of foreign policy that combine catastrophic tail risk with technical evaluation complexities, (ii) an ECOSYSTEM review that highlights the asymmetric focus on ASSESSMENT features over ACCESS, VERIFICATION, SECURITY, and OPERATIONALIZATION, and (iii) a demand-side evaluation framework that decomposes foreign-policy workflows into bounded, evaluable sub-tasks with human recombination. As AI systems are already being deployed in the conduct of war and peace, amid limited public evaluation infrastructure from the technical AI governance community, this agenda is an urgent priority.
AI Systems as Digital Public Goods -- Evidence and Recommendations from a Multi-Stakeholder Assessment
arXiv:2607.03427v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems are increasingly being positioned as potential Digital Public Goods (DPGs) to accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Yet, despite major global commitments, most notably the Global Digital Compact's call to "develop, disseminate and maintain safe and secure open-source software, open data, open artificial intelligence models and open standards that benefit society as a whole", very few AI systems currently meet the DPG Standard in practice. This report explains why, and what must change for "AI as Digital Public Goods" (AIDPGs) to become a credible, implementable pathway rather than an aspirational label. Commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and produced by United Nations University (UNU) in partnership with UN Office of Digital and Emergent Technologies (UN ODET), this assessment combines: (i) a structured desk review of policy, legal, and technical frameworks on DPGs, openness, and AI governance; (ii) key informant interviews with cross sector experts spanning the UN system, governments, civil society, academia, and the private sector; and (iii) a global survey to test whether interview themes hold across a broader sample and to surface where perspectives diverge by region, sector, and AI readiness.
Council Post: From Policy To Practice: National Strategies To Scale AI In Education
The next phase of AI in education will be decided not by the sophistication of the technology, but by the quality of the systems built around it.
Government AI Use as a Monitoring Primitive: A Public Document Pilot Study
arXiv:2607.04543v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Governments are important actors in frontier AI governance, but many facts about their adoption and use of AI systems are difficult to observe directly. Procurement disclosures and official statements are useful, but can also be delayed, selective, and better suited to measuring formal adoption than actual day-to-day use. We propose a complementary monitoring primitive: measuring traces of language-model assistance in public government documents. The approach is lightweight, externally reproducible, and based on revealed behavior rather than stated intent. In a pilot study of ten public document streams from U.S. and PRC government-related sources, we find that, while 2021 baselines are consistently near zero, by 2026, four of our ten sources show statistically significant signs of AI-assisted writing. In our sample, the U.S. signal concentrates in publications downstream of policy work; the PRC signal concentrates closer to it. We close by discussing how this signal could complement existing instruments for monitoring government AI adoption, and where it falls short.
Hybrid Algorithmic Governance in U.S. Welfare Administration: State- and County-Level AI as a Case of Support-Control Convergence
arXiv:2607.04503v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article examines the institutional conditions under which artificial intelligence systems in U.S. welfare administration come to operate as instruments of support or as instruments of control. Rather than asking what welfare algorithms "really" are (tools of proactive assistance or infrastructures of surveillance) the article starts from the premise that support and control are co-present within the same system, while their relative balance shifts over time. This movement is conceptualized through the notion of support-control convergence and the model of an institutional ratchet. Routine budgetary and political pressures make control-oriented effects easily measurable and politically capitalizable, whereas a return toward support requires external intervention of disproportionate force, such as judicial compulsion, legislative prohibition, or public scandal. Empirically, the article draws on process tracing of six state- and county-level cases: NYSDOL fraud detection, Michigan MiDAS, Illinois Medicaid managed care, LA County homelessness prevention, the Allegheny Family Screening Tool, and Washington Foster Care. The findings show that the system's orientation is shaped by institutional design, with the decisive parameter being the side on which the costs of algorithmic error are placed. Drift toward control is routine, while reversal is exceptional and costly. In the MiDAS case, activation required a single administrative decision, whereas reversal took nine years and a $20 million settlement; even then, the system did not return to a support-oriented configuration.
Illinois AI oversight law enacted, but questions loom over implementation
Illinois has enacted the first state law in the US requiring third-party audits for large, frontier AI developers. Tech industry lobbyists are planning to work with lawmakers on tweaks before it takes effect.
Thailand draft AI bill blends EU-inspired framework with Thai regulatory approach
Thailand's first draft AI law adopts a risk-based framework inspired by the EU AI Act, relying on sector-specific regulators and delegated legislation.
Greece Publishes Draft Law For EU AI Act Implementation - New Technology - Greece
Greece Publishes Draft Law For EU AI Act Implementation - New Technology - Greece ARTICLE 6 July 2026 # Greece Publishes Draft Law For EU AI Act Implementation BLBernitsas More #### Contributor Bernitsas is a market leader in the provision of commercial law services in Greece and one of the largest firms in the country. We count industry frontrunners, listed and private companies, supranational, global and national entities and corporations, and small and medium sized enterprises from all the major industry sectors among our clients. Explore Firm Details Greece published on 21 June 2026 a draft law to implement the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (the EU AI Act) on a national level (the Draft Law). The Draft Law is currently open for public review and consultation (until 6 July 2026). Greece Technology Tania Patsalia Your Author LinkedIn Connections Article Insights Tania Pat
US DOJ secures settlement with Willow Bridge in rental pricing antitrust case
The US Department of Justice reached a settlement with Willow Bridge to resolve claims regarding algorithmic coordination and anticompetitive practices in rental markets.
ICC Policy Paper Urges Inclusive AI Adoption and Global Governance Coordination - News and Statistics - IndexBox
The ICC releases a policy paper urging coordinated global action for inclusive AI adoption, highlighting the need for infrastructure, skills, governance, and public-private partnerships to close digital divides and ensure AI drives shared prosperity.
How New US Regulations Are Reshaping Global AI Access | NewsHub.co.uk
How New US Regulations Are Reshaping Global AI Access | NewsHub.co.uk Real Time - Cymru Football TV Launches: All Novira Cymru Premier Matches Live - Eight U.S. Tech Companies Surpass the EU’s Combined GDP - How to Obtain Fire Incident Reports in Devon and Somerset - Carlos Sainz Invites Sir Chris Hoy to British Grand Prix Amid Health Battles - PlayStation Fans React to Disc Drive Shortage Amid Digital Shift # How New US Regulations Are Reshaping Global AI Access Share on Facebook Tweet ## The US government is implementing stringent controls on advanced AI models, affecting global access and raising concerns about national security and innovation The landscape of artificial intelligence is undergoing a dramatic transformation as the US government implements stricter controls on advanced AI models. These new regulations are reshaping how businesses and governments worldwide access a
Industry leaders urge stronger oversight as AI adoption accelerates
Industry leaders are calling for stronger AI regulation and governance in Nigeria to ensure trust, profitability, and protect citizens from risks like deep
Where should the EU sit at the AI security table? | Euractiv
# Where should the EU sit at the AI security table? | Euractiv Author: Euractiv Published: 2026-07-06T13:16:47+00:00 Source: euractiv.com (euractiv.com) Language: en ## Story Where should the EU sit at the AI security table? | Euractiv Ga naar de hoofdinhoud [Euractiv](https://www.euractiv.com/) Open sub navigation Close menu Search Search Login [For policy professionals](https://www.euractiv.com/euractiv-pro/) ### Policy areas - [Economy](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/economy-jobs) - [Politics](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/politics) - [Agrifood](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/agriculture-food) - [Health](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/health-consumers) - [Tech](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/tech) - [Energy, Environment & Transport](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/eet) - [Defence](https://www.euractiv.com/sections/defence/) - [Politics](https://www.eura
AI Regulation Forum (2 days)
A two-day conference on AI regulation taking place in Brussels on September 22, 2026.
AI: A post-mortem on 'The Blip 2.0' at Anthropic. AI-RTZ #1140
Nature abhores a vacuum as they say. And the departure of ‘ AI and Crypto Czar’ David Sacks in recent days, left Secretary Lutnick at the AI helm, steering the US ship.
WebX 2026 Unveils Expanded Global Speaker and Sponsor Line-up and Programme Highlights Ahead of July Conference
Newly confirmed speakers from leading financial institutions digital asset firms and global payment networks join discussions on stablecoins AI regulation and the future of digital finance in Tokyo Tokyo Japan Jul 06 2026 ZEX PR WIRE WebX 2026 Asia s ...
Other
Get the full executive brief
Receive curated insights with practical implications for strategy, operations, and governance.